NZX Dividends Returns Pictured (UpicT)

An linked-index of the UpicT FAQ ... heavy going in places .........

<FAQ 1-3>

You claim that the data underlying the pictures is robust. Why then is it not guaranteed?

Why are the pictures so cluttered?

Why are the X'd returns only approximations of the dividends dates?


<FAQ 4-6>

What financial assumptions are built into the 'growth'-line?

What is 'growth' that goes down, and why is it sectionally divided into what is characterised as nominal and real?

You say somewhere the exceptions to the IC-RR-line's accuracy in representing the buy-in value at the Y-intersection are not germane. Please explain?


<FAQ 7-9>

I joined the opening and closing points of the 'growth'-line and the result was not as I had expected parallel to the IC-RR line?

If the PE numbers are not just clutter, can you give an example where they add explanatory value to a map?

Why are pictures not up to the minute with 'live' transaction information?


<Q-10-12>

Some investing strategies making use of the UpicT pictures could rely on the instant delivery of results. Can this be guaranteed?

I would like to try the excel-chart format. My rural connection is 56k, and I dont have Microsoft Office. What chance of siccess have I?

The Halting Problem? ... just academic surely ... (get off the grass!) ....


<Q-13-15>

Isn't the veil of too much information a contradiction?